Updated on July 2024
Existing citation style guidance varies significantly for citing AI-generated content, since AI tools are still evolving. When there is no official guidance appropriate for your use, include enough information to adhere to principles for why we cite. In addition to style guides for citation, you may need to consult publishers' policies for using AI tools or including AI-generated content in writing.
Cite when an AI tool was used to:
Authors are responsible for all content in their work. As AI cannot be held responsible it is generally not considered an author. If AI is used in the creation of an academic paper in any way, it should be cited in the text and references and/or in the acknowledgements.
Be sure to verify information provided by generative AI tools. Checking for reputable sources that confirm generative AI tools' outputs will make it less likely you end up using false or misleading information. It would also be a good idea to cite these sources in your work, in addition to attributing your use of generative AI. That way, you can give credit to authors and institutions instead of just AI tools, which are trained on human-generated information in the first place.
For more information about generative AI tools and the accuracy of the information they provide, see this article from MIT Sloan: When AI Gets It Wrong: Addressing AI Hallucinations and Bias
Know the AI use and citation policy for the school, class, and/or publication for which you are writing.
Citation management tools such as Zotero and Mendeley do not yet have "AI tools" as an item type. If you do not know which style you are using yet, use the "software" designation to save AI-generated content. You may also use the "website" item type. Add the name of the person who used the tool in the "extra" field. This is not used in any style currently, but is an important piece of metadata.
Once you decide which citation style you are using, you may need to edit the Zotero/Mendeley entry.
ACS Publications. 2019. “Deriving a Citation for a New Content Type.” In The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication. ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsguide.40306.
American Psychological Association. 2023. “How to Cite ChatGPT.” APA Style Blog (blog). April 7, 2023. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt.
Berdejo-Espinola, Violeta, and Tatsuya Amano. 2023. “AI Tools Can Improve Equity in Science.” Science 379 (6636): 991–991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg9714.
Cao, Kun. 2023. “How to Cite ChatGPT? Use A.I. Archives.” Medium (blog). August 31, 2023. https://medium.com/@kcao0228/how-to-cite-chatgpt-use-a-i-archives-bc254cb006d1.
Eaton, Lance. 2023. “Syllabi Policies for AI Generative Tools.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RMVwzjc1o0Mi8Blw_-JUTcXv02b2WRH86vw7mi16W3U/edit?usp=sharing.
Hosseini, Mohammad, Lisa M. Rasmussen, and David B. Resnik. 2023. “Using AI to Write Scholarly Publications.” Accountability in Research 0 (0): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.
Hosseini, Mohammad, David B Resnik, and Kristi Holmes. 2023. “The Ethics of Disclosing the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Writing Scholarly Manuscripts.” Research Ethics, June, 17470161231180449. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449.
“How Do I Cite Generative AI in MLA Style?” 2023. MLA Style Center (blog). March 17, 2023. https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai/.
MIT Sloan. 2023. “The Legal Issues Presented by Generative AI.” September 25, 2023. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/legal-issues-presented-generative-ai.
University of Chicago. 2017. “The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th Edition.” The Chicago Manual of Style Online. 2017. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org.