Read
information you find with a critical eye! Consider these points
when evaluating web sites, articles and books:
| Question |
Check: |
| Who? |
- Who wrote it?
- What ideas is the author trying to promote?
- Does the author seem to favor one idea over another?
- Could this affect the conclusions drawn?
|
- that the author's name is given
- where the author works - the author's affiliation
- who published the article
- the type of journal in which the article
is published (hint: most scholarly research appears in
journals that are refereed or reviewed by peers - sometimes
called "peer reviewed" journals)
- the reputation of the newspaper in which the article is published (is it from the Washington Post or the National Enquirer?)
|
| What? |
|
- Do
the conclusions in the paper seem justified? Do the conclusions make
sense - i.e., would you feel
comfortable drawing the same conclusions?
- While
you may not feel qualified to judge research in areas that are
unfamiliar, evaluating a research paper involves little more than being
critical of what you read and using a little common sense.
|
| Where? |
- Where's the information from? (see "Who?")
|
- the type of journal the article is published in or the reputation of the newspaper
- if the work was done by the author
("primary" source)
- if the author is summarizing others' work ("secondary" source) - if so, are
the sources cited (i.e. footnotes and/or a bibliography)?
- if statistics are given, is the source named?
|
| When? |
- How old is the information?
- Is it too old to be useful (this can
vary, depending on the area & type of information)?
|
- when was the article written?
- when was a web page last updated?
- is it possible that there are newer statistics?
|
For
more information about evaluating information, see the following
web pages or Ask Us!:
Search
Account
